Uso de antiepilépticos en niños hospitalizados en el Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell / Use of antiepileptic drugs in children hospitalized at the Pereira Rossell Pediatric Hospital / Uso de drogas antiepilépticas em crianças internadas no Hospital Pediátrico Pereira Rossell

Introducción: indicaciones off label, estrecho margen terapéutico, variabilidad farmacocinética, interacciones farmacológicas constituyen algunos de los problemas a abordar en el uso crónico de antiepilépticos (AE). Caracterizar su perfil de uso es necesario para promover su prescripción racional. Objetivo: Describir el perfil de uso de AE en menores de 15 años hospitalizados en el Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell entre 1/07/2020 y 31/12/2020. Material y método: estudio descriptivo, de menores de 15 años hospitalizados en cuidados moderados en tratamiento con AE. Variables: tipo y número de AE, motivo de la indicación, vía de administración, dosis, uso asociado con psicofármacos, adherencia. Resultados: recibían AE 113 pacientes, mediana edad 7 años, 50,4% sexo femenino. Motivo de la indicación: epilepsia (grupo A) 50,4% y otras patologías (grupo B) 49,6%. Mediana de edad: 2,7 años grupo A vs. 11,5 años grupo B. El AE más indicado fue levetiracetam en el grupo A (35%) y ácido valproico en el grupo B (35,7%). La asociación con psicofármacos se registró en 8,7% grupo A vs. 44,6% en el grupo B. Conclusiones: predominó el uso de levetiracetam en pacientes epilépticos. La mitad de los pacientes recibieron AE para patologías diferentes a la epilepsia, mayoritariamente psiquiátricas. En este grupo predominó el uso de ácido valproico. El análisis de esta serie permite una aproximación al conocimiento del perfil de uso de AE en los niños asistidos en este centro, y por tanto de los principales problemas a abordar. Futuros estudios multicéntricos con población ambulatoria son necesarios para mejorar el conocimiento y contribuir al uso racional de los mismos.

Introduction: off-label prescription, narrow therapeutic margin, pharmacokinetic variability, drug interaction, are some of the problems to consider in the chronic use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). It is necessary to characterize their utilization profile in order to promote rational prescription. Objective: to describe the utilization profile of AEDs in children under 15 years of age hospitalized at the Pereira Rossell Pediatric Hospital from 7/01/2020 to 12/31/2020. Material and Methods: descriptive study of children under 15 years of age hospitalized in moderate care units receiving treatment with AEDs. Variables: type and number of AEDs, reason for the prescription, dose, associated use of psychotropic drugs, compliance. Results: 113 patients received AEDs, median age 7 years, 50.4% females. Reason for prescription; epi- lepsy (group A) 50.4%, other pathologies (group B) 49.6%. Median age in group A 2.7 years, versus 1.1.5 years in group B. Most frequently prescribed AEDs was levetiracetam in group A (35%) and valproic acid in group B (37,7%). Association with psychotropic drugs was present in 8.7% of group A versus 44.6% of group B. Conclusions: levetiracem use was predominant in epileptic patients. Half of the patients received AEDs for pathologies other than epilepsy, mostly psychiatric. In this group the use of valproic acid was predominant. Analysis of this series enables an approximation to the understanding of the profile of AEDs use in children assisted at this Hospital, and there- fore an approximation to the problems to be considered. Future multicenter studies with an outpatient population are necessary to expand our knowledge and to contribute to a rational use of these drugs.

Introdução: indicações off-label, margem terapêutica estreita, variabilidade farmacocinética, interações farmacológicas são alguns dos problemas a serem abordados no uso crônico de drogas antiepilépticas (EA). Caracterizar seu perfil de uso é necessário para promover sua prescrição racional. Objetivo: descrever o perfil de utilização da AE em crianças menores de 15 anos internadas no Centro Hospitalar Pereira Rossell entre 01/07/2020 e 31/12/2020. Material e Métodos: estudo descritivo de crianças menores de 15 anos internadas em cuidados moderados em tratamento de EA. Variáveis: tipo e número de EAs, motivo da indicação, via de administração, dose, uso associado a psicotrópicos, adesão. Resultados: 113 pacientes receberam EA, com meia idade de 7 anos, 50,4% do sexo feminino. Motivo da indicação: epilepsia (grupo A) 50,4% e outras patologias (grupo B) 49,6%. Mediana de idade: 2,7 anos grupo A vs. 11,5 anos grupo B. O EA mais indicado foi Levetiracetam no grupo A (35%) e ácido valpróico no grupo B (35,7%). A associação com psicotrópicos foi registrada em 8,7% do grupo A vs. 44,6% no grupo B. Conclusões: o uso de Levetiracetam em pacientes epilépticos predominou. A metade dos pacientes recebeu AE por outras patologias que não foram a epilepsia, principalmente psiquiátricas. Nesse grupo, predominou o uso do ácido valpróico. A análise desta série permite aproximar o conhecimento do perfil de uso da AE nas crianças atendidas nesse centro e, portanto, a aproximação aos principais problemas a serem abordados. Futuros estudos multicêntricos com população ambulatorial são necessários para aprimorar o conhecimento e contribuir para sua utilização racional.

Cannabis and cannabinoids as an alternative remedy in metabolic syndrome

Abstract Metabolic syndrome (MetS), an epidemic defined as a group of interconnected physiological, biochemistry, clinical, and metabolic factors, directly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, and death. MetS therapy includes diet, physical exercise, and a poly-pharmacological intervention. Cannabis is mainly recognized for its recreational uses and has several medical applications for neurological diseases, due to its hypnotic, anxiolytic, antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and anticonvulsant activities. Although several clinical observations in Cannabis smokers suggest metabolic effects, its utility in metabolic disorders is unclear. This review aims to determine under what conditions Cannabis might be useful in the treatment of MetS. Cannabis contains 120 phytocannabinoids, of which Δ9-THC mediates its psychoactive effects. Cannabinoids exert biological effects through interactions with the endocannabinoid system, which modulates several physiologic and metabolic pathways through cannabinoid receptors (CB1/CB2). Signaling through both receptors inhibits neurotransmitter release. In general, endocannabinoid system stimulation in Cannabis smokers and Δ9-THC signaling through CB1 have been implicated in MetS development, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. In contrast, CB1 antagonists and non-psychotropic phytocannabinoids like cannabidiol reduce these effects through interactions with both cannabinoid and non-cannabinoid receptors. These pharmacological approaches represent a source of new therapeutic agents for MetS. However, more studies are necessary to support the therapeutic potential of Cannabis and cannabinoids in metabolic abnormalities

Detrimental effect of antiepileptic drugs dose in pediatric children with epilepsy in Saudi Arabia: A prospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT: This study aims to evaluate the effect of dose titration for different oral antiepileptic medications among children with epilepsy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.A single-center prospective pilot, cohort study was undertaken at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All medical records of pediatric patients below the age of 14 years of age who has been newly diagnosed with epilepsy by attending a medical specialist or on a new epileptic treatment plans were enrolled in the study.A total of 76 epileptic patients were screened for 3 months' period and 48 patients were included in this study. Out of the 48 patients, 31 patients followed the regular practice in the titration processes and 17 patients were in the British national formulary (BNF) guideline. Fifteen children who were on monotherapy of levetiracetam were in regular practice guideline experienced poor seizure control with a recorded number of seizure incidence (n = 10). The patient in regular practice guidelines using a combination therapy of phenytoin and levetiracetam were experiencing some behavioral disturbance and sedation effect. Seventeen patients followed in the BNF guideline who were on levetiracetam were experienced less adverse effect (n = 2) with no behavioral changes.The group who followed the regular practice found having a greater incidence of documented adverse effects compared to the patients following the BNF guideline. The titrating antiepileptic medication has a detrimental effect on the pediatric population as observed in this study.

Treating Epilepsy Patients with Investigational Anti-COVID-19 Drugs: Recommendations by the Israeli Chapter of the ILAE.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and its management in patients with epilepsy can be complex. Prescribers should consider potential effects of investigational anti-COVID-19 drugs on seizures, immunomodulation by anti-seizure medications (ASMs), changes in ASM pharmacokinetics, and the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The goal of the Board of the Israeli League Against Epilepsy (the Israeli Chapter of the International League Against Epilepsy, ILAE) was to summarize the main principles of the pharmacological treatment of COVID-19 in patients with epilepsy. This guide was based on current literature, drug labels, and drug interaction resources. We summarized the available data related to the potential implications of anti-COVID-19 co-medication in patients treated with ASMs. Our recommendations refer to drug selection, dosing, and patient monitoring. Given the limited availability of data, some recommendations are based on general pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic principles and might apply to additional future drug combinations as novel treatments emerge. They do not replace evidence-based guidelines, should those become available. Awareness to drug characteristics that increase the risk of interactions can help adjust anti-COVID-19 and ASM treatment for patients with epilepsy.

Functional and behavioral signatures of Kv7 activator drug subtypes.

OBJECTIVE: Voltage-gated potassium channels of the KCNQ (Kv7) family are targeted by a variety of activator compounds with therapeutic potential for treatment of epilepsy. Exploration of this drug class has revealed a variety of effective compounds with diverse mechanisms. In this study, we aimed to clarify functional criteria for categorization of Kv7 activator compounds, and to compare the effects of prototypical drugs in a zebrafish larvae model. METHODS: In vitro electrophysiological approaches with recombinant ion channels were used to highlight functional properties important for classification of drug mechanisms. We also benchmarked the effects of representative antiepileptic Kv7 activator drugs using behavioral seizure assays of zebrafish larvae and in vivo Ca2+ imaging with the ratiometric Ca2+ sensor CaMPARI. RESULTS: Drug effects on channel gating kinetics, and drug sensitivity profiles to diagnostic channel mutations, were used to highlight properties for categorization of Kv7 activator drugs into voltage sensor-targeted or pore-targeted subtypes. Quantifying seizures and ratiometric Ca2+ imaging in freely swimming zebrafish larvae demonstrated that while all Kv7 activators tested lead to suppression of neuronal excitability, pore-targeted activators (like ML213 and retigabine) strongly suppress seizure behavior, whereas ICA-069673 triggers a seizure-like hypermotile behavior. SIGNIFICANCE: This study suggests criteria to categorize antiepileptic Kv7 activator drugs based on their underlying mechanism. We also establish the use of in vivo CaMPARI as a tool for screening effects of anticonvulsant drugs on neuronal excitability in zebrafish. In summary, despite a shared ability to suppress neuronal excitability, our findings illustrate how mechanistic differences between Kv7 activator subtypes influence their effects on heteromeric channels and lead to vastly different in vivo outcomes.

Estudio observacional multicéntrico español sobre el empleo de fármacos antiepilépticos en consultas de neurología / Observational multicentre study into the use of antiepileptic drugs in Spanish neurology consultations

OBJETIVO: Cuantificar el tipo de fármacos antiepilépticos (FAE) empleados en epilepsia, en consultas de neurología. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo observacional sobre una muestra de 559 pacientes mayores de 14 años con epilepsia y en tratamiento farmacológico, recogidos en consultas ambulatorias por 47 neurólogos en España en mayo del año 2016. Para las clasificaciones clínicas de la epilepsia se utilizaron las de la Liga Internacional contra la Epilepsia (ILAE). Los FAE se clasificaron según el año de comercialización: clásicos (anteriores al 1990) y nuevos (los posteriores). Se realiza un análisis descriptivo de las variables cualitativas y cuantitativas. RESULTADOS: Demográficos: 54,6% mujeres; edad media 42,7 años; edad media de inicio de la epilepsia 22,4 años. Clínicos: predominan las crisis parciales: 75,7%; sintomáticas: 51,5% y con epilepsia farmacorresistente: 32,4%. Pacientes libres de crisis en el último año: 35,6%. Comorbilidad asociada: 59,2%. Tratamiento: número de FAE empleados 1103; 64,6% FAE nuevos. El 85,4% de los pacientes tratados con FAE nuevos. La media y el rango de FAE empleados: 2 (1-5). El 59,6% recibía politerapia. Los FAE más utilizados: levetiracetam (LEV) 42,6%, ácido valproico (VPA) 25,4%, lamotrigina 19,5%, carbamacepina 17,9% y lacosamida 17,5%. Ningún FAE fue empleado exclusivamente en monoterapia. El más utilizado en crisis generalizadas fue el VPA (48,2%) y en parciales, el LEV (43,2%). El VPA fue menos utilizado en mujeres. Los pacientes sin control de sus crisis (48,7%) o con comorbilidad asociada (45,6%) recibían la combinación de ambos tipos de FAE, en mayor porcentaje, que de forma aislada. CONCLUSIONES: La mayoría de los pacientes toman FAE nuevos. La asociación de ambos tipos de FAE se emplea en mayor medida en los pacientes sin control de sus crisis o con comorbilidad asociada

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to quantify the types of antiepileptic drugs (AED) prescribed in neurology consultations. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This descriptive, observational study included a sample of 559 patients older than 14 years, diagnosed with epilepsy, and receiving pharmacological treatment. Data were collected at outpatient consultations by 47 Spanish neurologists in May 2016. Epilepsy was defined based on the International League Against Epilepsy classification. According to the year of marketing, AEDs were categorised as classic (before 1990) or new (after 1990). We performed a descriptive analysis of qualitative and quantitative variables. RESULTS: Female patients accounted for 54.6% of the sample. Mean age was 42.7 years; mean age of onset was 22.4. Regarding epilepsy type, 75.7% of patients experienced partial seizures, 51.5% were symptomatic,32.4% had refractory epilepsy, 35.6% had been seizure-free for the previous year, and 59.2% had associated comorbidities.A total of 1103 AED prescriptions were made; 64.6% of prescriptions were for new AEDs; 85.4% of patients received new AEDs. Patients received a mean of 2 AEDs (range, 1-5). A total of 59.6% of patients received polytherapy.The most frequently prescribed AEDs were levetiracetam (42.6%), valproic acid (25.4%), lamotrigine (19.5%), carbamazepine (17.9%), and lacosamide (17.5%). No AED was employed exclusively as monotherapy. The most frequently prescribed AEDs for generalised and partial seizures were valproic acid (48.2%) and levetiracetam (43.2%), respectively. Valproic acid was less frequently prescribed to female patients. Patients with refractory epilepsy or with associated comorbidities were more frequently prescribed a combination of new and classic AEDs (48.7% and 45.6%, respectively) than only one type of AED. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients received new AEDs. The combination of classic and new AEDs was more frequently prescribed to patients with refractory epilepsy or with associated comorbidities

Observational multicentre study into the use of antiepileptic drugs in Spanish neurology consultations. / Estudio observacional multicéntrico español sobre el empleo de fármacos antiepilépticos en consultas de neurología.

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to quantify the types of antiepileptic drugs (AED) prescribed in neurology consultations. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This descriptive, observational study included a sample of 559 patients older than 14 years, diagnosed with epilepsy, and receiving pharmacological treatment. Data were collected at outpatient consultations by 47 Spanish neurologists in May 2016. Epilepsy was defined based on the International League Against Epilepsy classification. According to the year of marketing, AEDs were categorised as classic (before 1990) or new (after 1990). We performed a descriptive analysis of qualitative and quantitative variables. RESULTS: Female patients accounted for 54.6% of the sample. Mean age was 42.7 years; mean age of onset was 22.4. Regarding epilepsy type, 75.7% of patients experienced partial seizures, 51.5% were symptomatic,32.4% had refractory epilepsy, 35.6% had been seizure-free for the previous year, and 59.2% had associated comorbidities.A total of 1103 AED prescriptions were made; 64.6% of prescriptions were for new AEDs; 85.4% of patients received new AEDs. Patients received a mean of 2 AEDs (range, 1-5). A total of 59.6% of patients received polytherapy.The most frequently prescribed AEDs were levetiracetam (42.6%), valproic acid (25.4%), lamotrigine (19.5%), carbamazepine (17.9%), and lacosamide (17.5%). No AED was employed exclusively as monotherapy. The most frequently prescribed AEDs for generalised and partial seizures were valproic acid (48.2%) and levetiracetam (43.2%), respectively. Valproic acid was less frequently prescribed to female patients. Patients with refractory epilepsy or with associated comorbidities were more frequently prescribed a combination of new and classic AEDs (48.7% and 45.6%, respectively) than only one type of AED. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients received new AEDs. The combination of classic and new AEDs was more frequently prescribed to patients with refractory epilepsy or with associated comorbidities.

Trends in antiepileptic drug treatment and effectiveness in clinical practice in England from 2003 to 2016: a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evolution of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment patterns and seizure outcomes in England from 2003 to 2016. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink and National Health Service Digital Hospital Episode Statistics databases. Patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy were identified and followed until end of data availability. Three eras were defined starting 1 April 2003 (first National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline); 1 September 2007 (Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs publication); and 1 January 2012 (second NICE guideline). OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from diagnosis to first AED; AED sequence; time from first AED to first 1-year remission period (no new AED attempts and no seizure-related healthcare events); time from first AED to refractoriness (third AED attempt regardless of reason); Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event variables. RESULTS: 4388 patients were included (mean follow-up: 6.8, 4.2 and 1.7 years by era). 84.6% of adults (≥16 years), 75.5% of children (<16) and 89.1% of elderly subgroup (65+) received treatment within 1 year; rates were generally stable over time. Treatment trends included reduced use of carbamazepine (adult first line, era 1: 34.9%; era 3: 10.7%) and phenytoin, earlier line and increased use of levetiracetam (adult first line, era 1: 2.6%; era 3: 26.2%) and lamotrigine (particularly in adults and elderly subgroup), and a larger number of different AEDs used. Valproate use shifted somewhat to later lines. Rates of 1-year remission within 2 years of starting treatment increased in adults (era 1: 71.9%; era 3: 81.4%) and elderly (era 1: 76.1%; era 3: 81.7%). Overall, 55.5% of patients relapsed after achieving 1-year remission. Refractoriness rates remained stable over time (~26% of adults within 5 years). CONCLUSION: Treatment trends often were not aligned with era-relevant guidance. However, our results suggest a slight improvement in epilepsy treatment outcomes over the 13-year period.

[Genetically determined epileptic encephalopathies]. / Encefalopatías epilépticas determinadas genéticamente.

Epileptic encephalopathies is a group of epileptic syndromes characterized by progressive cognitive impairment beyond the expected for the epilepsy activity. They are characterized by severe pharmaco-resistant epilepsy, severely abnormal electroencephalograms, early-age onset, neurocognitve impairment, variable phenotype and usually normal brain MRI. These syndromes are usually genetically determined. A correct and timely diagnosis could help and guide the medical counselling and the correct therapeutic approach improving the short, medium and long term outcomes. In this article we review the electroencephalographic and genetic findings along with the most recommended therapeutic options facilitating the clinical management. We include the following epileptic encephalopathy syndromes: Ohtahara, early myoclonic encephalopathy, epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures, West, Dravet, non-progressive myoclonic status, Doose, Lennox-Gastaut, Landau-Kleffner and continuous spike-wave during sleep epilepsy.

Las encefalopatías epilépticas es un grupo de síndromes epilépticos caracterizados por el deterioro cognitivo más allá de lo esperado debido a la actividad epiléptica. Se caracterizan por presentar resistencia farmacológica grave, electroencefalogramas profundamente anormales, inicio en la niñez temprana, deterioro neurocognitivo, fenotipo variable y resonancia magnética de cerebro usualmente normal. Frecuentemente estos síndromes están genéticamente determinados. Su diagnóstico correcto y oportuno puede contribuir y guiar el consejo médico y terapia adecuada, influyendo así en el pronóstico a corto, mediano y largo plazo. En este artículo se revisan los hallazgos electroencefalográficos, genéticos y opciones terapéuticas más recomendadas, facilitando así la conducta clínica. Las encefalopatías epilépticas incluidas en este artículos abarcan los síndromes de Ohtahara, encefalopatia mioclónica temprana, epilepsia focal migratoria de la infancia, West, Dravet, estado mioclónico en encefalopatías no progresivas, Doose, Lennox-Gastaut, Landau-Kleffner y epilepsia con espiga-onda continuas durante el sueño de onda lenta.

[New antiepileptic drugs]. / Nuevos fármacos antiepilépticos.

Antiepileptic drugs are the first treatment option in patients with epilepsy. Drugs developed after 2000 are known as third generation antiepileptic drugs. These medications offer new mechanisms of action and favorable pharmacokinetics, decreasing the occurrence of side effects and drug-drug interactions. Broad spectrum antiepileptic drugs, such as brivaracetam and clobazam are good choices for generalized tonic colonic seizures and are well tolerated.New sodium channel blockers such as lacosamide and eslicarbazepine, have a more "benign" side effect profile than the first or second generation of sodium channel blockers. These new drugs are useful therapies in patients with epilepsy of difficult control. Cannabidiol and fenfluramine are useful in the treatment of Dravet or Lennox Gastaut syndrome. Allopregnenolona and ganaxolone showed good efficacy in status epilepticus and could play an important future role in this clinical scenario.

Los fármacos antiepilépticos constituyen el tratamiento inicial en pacientes con epilepsia. Los antIepilépticos producidos después del año 2000 se conocen como fármacos de tercera generación. Estas drogas ofrecen nuevos mecanismos de acción y una farmacocinética más favorable, minimizando efectos adversos o interacciones medicamentosas. Las drogas de amplio espectro como brivaracetam y clobazam son una buena opción en casos de crisis generalizadas y poseen un grado de tolerabilidad muy aceptable. Los nuevos antiepilépticos bloqueadores de canales de sodio, como lacosamida y eslicarbazepina tienen un perfil de efectos adversos más favorable que los bloqueadores de sodio de primera o segunda generación. Estos nuevos medicamentos pueden utilizarse en pacientes con epilepsia de difícil control. Cannabidiol y fenfluramina son muy útiles en el tratamiento del síndrome de Dravet o Lennox Gastaut. La Alopregnenolona y ganaxolona demuestran buena eficacia en casos de estado epiléptico y podrían en el futuro cercano tener un papel importante en este escenario clínico.

Nuevos fármacos antiepilépticos / New antiepileptic drugs

Los fármacos antiepilépticos constituyen el tratamiento inicial en pacientes con epilepsia. Los antIepilépticos producidos después del año 2000 se conocen como fármacos de tercera generación. Estas drogas ofrecen nuevos mecanismos de acción y una farmacocinética más favorable, minimizando efectos adversos o interacciones medicamentosas. Las drogas de amplio espectro como brivaracetam y clobazam son una buena opción en casos de crisis generalizadas y poseen un grado de tolerabilidad muy aceptable. Los nuevos antiepilépticos bloqueadores de canales de sodio, como lacosamida y eslicarbazepina tienen un perfil de efectos adversos más favorable que los bloqueadores de sodio de primera o segunda generación. Estos nuevos medicamentos pueden utilizarse en pacientes con epilepsia de difícil control. Cannabidiol y fenfluramina son muy útiles en el tratamiento del síndrome de Dravet o Lennox Gastaut. La Alopregnenolona y ganaxolona demuestran buena eficacia en casos de estado epiléptico y podrían en el futuro cercano tener un papel importante en este escenario clínico.

Antiepileptic drugs are the first treatment option in patients with epilepsy. Drugs developed after 2000 are known as third generation antiepileptic drugs. These medications offer new mechanisms of action and favorable pharmacokinetics, decreasing the occurrence of side effects and drug-drug interactions. Broad spectrum antiepileptic drugs, such as brivaracetam and clobazam are good choices for generalized tonic colonic seizures and are well tolerated.New sodium channel blockers such as lacosamide and eslicarbazepine, have a more "benign" side effect profile than the first or second generation of sodium channel blockers. These new drugs are useful therapies in patients with epilepsy of difficult control. Cannabidiol and fenfluramine are useful in the treatment of Dravet or Lennox Gastaut syndrome. Allopregnenolona and ganaxolone showed good efficacy in status epilepticus and could play an important future role in this clinical scenario.

Encefalopatías epilépticas determinadas genéticamente / Genetically determined epileptic encephalopathies

Las encefalopatías epilépticas es un grupo de síndromes epilépticos caracterizados por el deterioro cognitivo más allá de lo esperado debido a la actividad epiléptica. Se caracterizan por presentar resistencia farmacológica grave, electroencefalogramas profundamente anormales, inicio en la niñez temprana, deterioro neurocognitivo, fenotipo variable y resonancia magnética de cerebro usualmente normal. Frecuentemente estos síndromes están genéticamente determinados. Su diagnóstico correcto y oportuno puede contribuir y guiar el consejo médico y terapia adecuada, influyendo así en el pronóstico a corto, mediano y largo plazo. En este artículo se revisan los hallazgos electroencefalográficos, genéticos y opciones terapéuticas más recomendadas, facilitando así la conducta clínica. Las encefalopatías epilépticas incluidas en este artículos abarcan los síndromes de Ohtahara, encefalopatia mioclónica temprana, epilepsia focal migratoria de la infancia, West, Dravet, estado mioclónico en encefalopatías no progresivas, Doose, Lennox-Gastaut, Landau-Kleffner y epilepsia con espiga-onda continuas durante el sueño de onda lenta.

Epileptic encephalopathies is a group of epileptic syndromes characterized by progressive cognitive impairment beyond the expected for the epilepsy activity. They are characterized by severe pharmaco-resistant epilepsy, severely abnormal electroencephalograms, early-age onset, neurocognitve impairment, variable phenotype and usually normal brain MRI. These syndromes are usually genetically determined. A correct and timely diagnosis could help and guide the medical counselling and the correct therapeutic approach improving the short, medium and long term outcomes. In this article we review the electroencephalographic and genetic findings along with the most recommended therapeutic options facilitating the clinical management. We include the following epileptic encephalopathy syndromes: Ohtahara, early myoclonic encephalopathy, epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures, West, Dravet, non-progressive myoclonic status, Doose, Lennox-Gastaut, Landau-Kleffner and continuous spike-wave during sleep epilepsy.

Perampanel como terapia añadida precoz en el tratamiento de la epilepsia / Perampanel as an early added therapy in the treatment of epilepsy

No disponible

Anticonvulsant Mood Stabilizer and Lithium Use and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the comparative safety of mood stabilizers with respect to risk of preeclampsia, placental abruption, growth restriction, and preterm birth. METHODS: A cohort study was carried out using Medicaid Analytic eXtract data for pregnant women linked to live born infants enrolled from 2000 to 2010. Exposure to lamotrigine, valproate, topiramate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and lithium during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was assessed. The reference group did not fill a prescription for an anticonvulsant or lithium during the 3 months prior to conception or the first half of pregnancy. Women who continued mood stabilizer monotherapy after 20 weeks were also compared to those who discontinued. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with propensity score stratification to control for confounding. RESULTS: Among 1,472,672 pregnancies, 10,575 (0.7%) were exposed to anticonvulsant mood stabilizer or lithium monotherapy and 917 (0.06%) were exposed to polytherapy. In unadjusted analyses, exposure to each specific mood stabilizer and polytherapy was associated with increased risks of all adverse outcomes considered compared to no exposure (RR ranged from 1.15 to 1.56). However, these RR estimates were not meaningfully elevated with adjustment for confounding (0.89 to 1.16). Continuation of mood stabilizers was not associated with an increased risk for any outcomes compared to discontinuation and was associated with a reduced risk of placental abruption and growth restriction. CONCLUSIONS: Anticonvulsant mood stabilizers and lithium are not associated with an increased risk of placenta-mediated complications or preterm birth after accounting for confounding by indication.

Association of Prenatal Exposure to Valproate and Other Antiepileptic Drugs With Risk for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Offspring.

Importance: Valproate is an antiepileptic drug (AED) used in the treatment of epilepsy and many other neurological and psychiatric disorders. Its use in pregnancy is associated with increased risks of congenital malformations and adverse neurodevelopment in the offspring and may be associated with an increased risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Objective: To determine whether prenatal exposure to valproate and other AEDs is associated with an increased risk of ADHD in the offspring. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a population-based cohort study of all live-born singleton children in Denmark from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2011 (N = 913 302). Information on prenatal exposure to AEDs, including valproate, was obtained from the Danish National Prescription Registry and all children with ADHD were identified (children with diagnosed ADHD in the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register or children who redeemed a prescription for ADHD medication). The cohort was followed up from birth until the day of the ADHD diagnosis, death, emigration, or December 31, 2015, whichever came first. Data were analyzed in September 2018. Exposures: Maternal use of valproate and other AEDs in pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cox regression estimates of the hazard ratio of ADHD. Estimates were adjusted for potential confounders. Results: The cohort included 913 302 children (mean age at end of study, 10.1 years; median age, 9.4 years; interquartile range, 7.2-12.8 years; 468 708 [51.3%] male). A total of 580 were identified as having been exposed to valproate during pregnancy; of them, 49 (8.4%) had ADHD. Among the 912 722 children who were unexposed to valproate, 29 396 (3.2%) had ADHD. Children with prenatal valproate exposure had a 48% increased risk of ADHD (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09-2.00) compared with children with no valproate exposure. The absolute 15-year risk of ADHD was 4.6% (95% CI, 4.5%-4.6%) in children unexposed to valproate and 11.0% (95% CI, 8.2%-14.2%) in children who were exposed to valproate in pregnancy. No associations were found between other AEDs and ADHD. Conclusions and Relevance: Maternal use of valproate, but not other AEDs, during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of ADHD in the offspring. These findings have important implications for the counseling of women of childbearing potential using valproate.

[Treatment of neonatal seizures]. / Tratamiento de las convulsiones neonatales.

Neonatal seizures are among the most dramatic manifestations of acute central nervous system dysfunction. The incidence is much higher in very low weight neonates than in full term infants (˜ 58 and 3.5 per 100 live births, respectively). Neonatal seizures represent the clinical manifestation of a non-specific cortical cerebral dysfunction which can lead to permanent brain injury. The etiology is multifactorial and requires a judicious assessment for each clinical scenario. The diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that most neonatal seizures are subclinical, that is, may display very subtle or no clinical changes and the diagnosis may just be based on EEG findings. The treatment depends on the etiology, but an early and opportune intervention prevents further brain damage, thus improving prognosis. Although early identification and treatment are critical, the diagnosis of neonatal seizures is complicated by several factors such as different clinical presentations, possible etiologies and several treatment options. Nevertheless, research studies and clinical evidence have shown that early treatment with anti-seizure medications can change the outcome.

Tratamiento de las convulsiones neonatales / Treatment of neonatal seizures

Las convulsiones neonatales están entre las manifestaciones más dramáticas de enfermedad neurológica y deben ser consideradas una emergencia. La incidencia es 3.5 por cada 100 nacidos a término y en prematuros asciende a 58 por cada 100 nacidos vivos. Las convulsiones neonatales son una manifestación clínica de disfunción cortical no específica que puede dar lugar a daño permanente del cerebro. La etiología es multifactorial y requiere una evaluación cuidadosa de cada escenario clínico. El diagnóstico es más complejo por el hecho de que la mayoría de convulsiones son sub-clínicas o sutiles y a veces no tienen correlación con el electroencefalograma. Aunque la identificación temprana y el tratamiento son críticos, el diagnóstico se complica por algunos factores como la variedad de presentaciones clínicas, diferentes etiologías y varias alternativas de tratamiento. De todas maneras, los estudios de investigación y la evidencia clínica disponible han demostrado que el tratamiento precoz con fármacos anticonvulsivantes puede mejorar el pronóstico.

Neonatal seizures are among the most dramatic manifestations of acute central nervous system dysfunction. The incidence is much higher in very low weight neonates than in full term infants (~58 and 3.5 per 100 live births, respectively). Neonatal seizures represent the clinical manifestation of a non-specific cortical cerebral dysfunction which can lead to permanent brain injury. The etiology is multifactorial and requires a judicious assessment for each clinical scenario. The diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that most neonatal seizures are subclinical, that is, may display very subtle or no clinical changes and the diagnosis may just be based on EEG findings. The treatment depends on the etiology, but an early and opportune intervention prevents further brain damage, thus improving prognosis. Although early identification and treatment are critical, the diagnosis of neonatal seizures is complicated by several factors such as different clinical presentations, possible etiologies and several treatment options. Nevertheless, research studies and clinical evidence have shown that early treatment with anti-seizure medications can change the outcome.

Effect of valproic acid on perampanel pharmacokinetics in patients with epilepsy.

We prospectively examined the effect of antiepileptic (AED) cotherapy on steady state plasma concentrations of perampanel (PMP) in epileptic patients. We classified AEDs as strong enzyme inducers (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, oxcarbazepine), not strong enzyme inducers/not inhibitors (levetiracetam, lamotrigine, topiramate, rufinamide, lacosamide, zonisamide, clobazam), and enzyme inhibitors (valproic acid [VPA]). The main outcome was the comparison of PMP plasma concentration to weight-adjusted dose ratio (C/D; [µg/mL]/mg kg-1  d-1 ) among comedication subgroups. From 79 patients (42 females, 37 males) aged (mean ± standard deviation) 33 ± 13 years (range = 12-66 years), 114 plasma samples were collected. Twenty-eight patients (44 samples) were cotreated with enzyme inducers (group A), 21 (27 samples) with not strong enzyme inducers/not inhibitors (group B), 21 (31 samples) with not strong enzyme inducers/not inhibitors + VPA (group C), and 9 (12 samples) with enzyme inducers + VPA (group D). PMP C/D was reduced (-56%, P < .001) in group A (1.79 ± 0.80) versus group B (4.05 ± 2.16) and increased (P < .001) in group C (6.72 ± 4.04) compared with groups A (+275%), B (+66%), and D (2.76 ± 2.00, +143%). Our study documents the unpublished higher PMP C/D in patients cotreated with VPA. These findings have both theoretical relevance, suggesting better characterization of PMP metabolic pathways with ad hoc studies, and clinical usefulness in managing patients on AED polytherapy.

The management of epilepsy in children and adults.

The International League Against Epilepsy has recently published a new classification of epileptic seizures and epilepsies to reflect the major scientific advances in our understanding of the epilepsies since the last formal classification 28 years ago. The classification emphasises the importance of aetiology, which allows the optimisation of management. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the main approach to epilepsy treatment and achieve seizure freedom in about two-thirds of patients. More than 15 second generation AEDs have been introduced since the 1990s, expanding opportunities to tailor treatment for each patient. However, they have not substantially altered the overall seizure-free outcomes. Epilepsy surgery is the most effective treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy and should be considered as soon as appropriate trials of two AEDs have failed. The success of epilepsy surgery is influenced by different factors, including epilepsy syndrome, presence and type of epileptogenic lesion, and duration of post-operative follow-up. For patients who are not eligible for epilepsy surgery or for whom surgery has failed, trials of alternative AEDs or other non-pharmacological therapies, such as the ketogenic diet and neurostimulation, may improve seizure control. Ongoing research into novel antiepileptic agents, improved techniques to optimise epilepsy surgery, and other non-pharmacological therapies fuel hope to reduce the proportion of individuals with uncontrolled seizures. With the plethora of gene discoveries in the epilepsies, "precision therapies" specifically targeting the molecular underpinnings are beginning to emerge and hold great promise for future therapeutic approaches.

Herbal medicine uses to treat people with epilepsy: A survey in rural communities of northern Peru.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Epilepsy affects 150,000 people in Peru, with a prevalence of 16.6/1000 and a treatment gap of 75%. Herbal medicine (HM) is widely used in this country. AIM OF THE STUDY: We aimed to assess the use of plants in a rural community in northern Peru as part of therapeutic strategies for people with epilepsy (PWE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional observational and descriptive study. The inclusion criteria for people with epilepsy were 2 years of age and over, having lived in the study area for at least 3 months and a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy by a neurologist. The information was gathered through structured interviews using a survey questionnaire. Botanical species used by people with epilepsy or traditional healers were collected and identified. RESULTS: Out of the 228 people with epilepsy included, 60.0% had used herbal remedies and 54.8% both herbal medicine and anti-epileptic drugs. The traditional healer was the first practitioner consulted by 45.2% of people with epilepsy. Sixty-six species have been mentioned by the people with epilepsy and traditional healers on the treatment of epilepsy. Carbamazepine was the most prescribed anti-epileptic drug with 33.2% of prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to measure a percentage of use of herbal medicine for epilepsy in Peru. It would be interesting to conduct a pharmacological evaluation of the most commonly used species on epileptic models to validate and secure their use.